Israelyan

Israelyan v. Gonzales

Good Law
171 F. App'x 85
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 2006No. 04-74757; Agency No. A75-663-550California306 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Karine Israelyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing her appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum and withholding of removal, and request for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility finding and will uphold the BIA’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 992-93 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

We conclude that substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision because Israelyan’s claim that there is widespread persecution of Jehovah’s Witnesses in Armenia similar to the type she claims to have experienced contradicts both the State Department Country Conditions Report and the documentary evidence that she submitted in support of her claim. See Pal v. INS, 204 F.3d 935, 938 (9th Cir. 2000) (documents submitted by petitioner which contradict petitioner’s testimony form the basis for an adverse credibility finding). Israelyan also failed to produce corroborating evidence to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.