Hurst

Hurst v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
171 F. App'x 103
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 2006No. 03-56738; D.C. No. CV-01-07917-HLHCalifornia616 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Richard Hurst alleges that the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) discriminated against him on the basis of race and ethnicity. Hurst alleged in his charge of discrimination filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that he was not selected for a firefighter position with the LAFD because he is of Hispanic national origin. 1 However, in his second amended complaint filed in the district court, Hurst alleged pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights *104 Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940, that the LAFD discriminated against him because he is a “white male.” The district court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction over Hurst’s appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

Before bringing a civil action under Title VII or the FEHA, a plaintiff must have timely filed an administrative charge with the EEOC and the DFEH, respectively. 2 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(l); Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 12960(b), 12965(b). The EEOC charges must be “sufficiently precise to ... describe generally the action or practices complained of.” EEOC Procedural…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.