Gonzalez Cisneros v. Gonzales

Good Law
171 F. App'x 119
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 2006No. 04-71650California363 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Gonzalez Cisneros, Jr., a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review *120 of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his motion to reconsider its removal order and reopen proceedings conducted in absentia. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the denial of a motion to reopen and reconsider for abuse of discretion, de Martinez v. Ashcroft, 374 F.3d 759, 761 (9th Cir.2004). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

Gonzalez Cisneros contends that there was not sufficient evidence to support the IJ’s removal order. By submitting Gonzalez Cisneros’ birth certificate, the government established a prima facie case of alienage and shifted the burden of proving lawful entry to Gonzalez Cisneros. See Lopez-Chavez v. INS, 259 F.3d 1176, 1181 (9th Cir.2001) (noting that once a prima facie case of alienage is established through proof of foreign birth, alien has the burden of proving time, place and manner of entry). By failing to appear at his removal hearing, Gonzalez Cisneros missed his chance to rebut the presumption of removability.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.