Herrera-Prudente

Herrera-Prudente v. Gonzales

Good Law
171 F. App'x 122
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 2006No. 03-73979; Agency No. A79-789-062California312 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Abraham Herrera-Prudente, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We grant the petition and remand for further proceedings.

Herrera-Prudente contends that the immigration judge erred in concluding that he failed to satisfy the continuous physical presence requirement under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(A). He testified that he left the United States in 1993 and in 1995, and that when he attempted to come back he was arrested by INS officers and allowed to return to Mexico. He answered “yes” to the question, “And those times in 1993 and 1995, instead of being deported, the officers just allowed you to return to Mexico, is that correct?” In his application he described his returns in 1993 and 1995 as “INS voluntary returnfs] to Mexico.”

An alien who departs the United States pursuant to an administrative voluntary departure in lieu of deportation or removal proceedings interrupts his physical presence in this country. Vasquez-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 343 F.3d 961, 972 (9th Cir.2003) (per…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.