Roe
Roe v. Hesperia Unified School Dist.
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
“This case comes to us at the demurrer stage, so for present purposes we assume
the truth of the allegations in the” operative pleading. (Brown v. USA Taekwondo (2021)
11 Cal.5th 204, 209 (Brown).)
From August 2018 through January 2019, plaintiffs were six-year-old first grade
students who attended Maple Elementary School (Maple) within the District. The
District receives financial assistance from the federal government.
Pedro Martinez worked at Maple as a janitor and had worked there since 2005.
Martinez’s position as a janitor did not require him to have any one-on-one contact with
the students.
Martinez engaged in a variety of activities with the students that plaintiffs
characterize as “‘grooming’ activities” that were “designed to lure minor students,
including [p]laintiffs, into a false sense of security around him.” Martinez befriended
young boys, gave plaintiffs sweet treats, showed plaintiffs video games on YouTube,
showed plaintiffs videos of Mickey Mouse, referred to his penis to plaintiffs as “‘Mickey
In the opening brief, appellants mistakenly refer to the minor plaintiff David Roe as Luke Roe. According to the allegations in the third…