Herrera-Sanchez

United States v. Herrera-Sanchez

Good Law
171 F. App'x 629
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 2006No. 04-30113California290 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM and ORDER **

Hermenegildo Herrera-Sanchez appeals from his guilty plea conviction and the 63-month sentence imposed for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 .

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Herrera-Sanchez has *630 filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Herrera-Sanchez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We affirm the conviction. Appellant was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory. ‘We have held that “where the district court did not treat the sentencing guidelines as advisory but the defendant’s sentence was not enhanced by extra-verdict findings,’ a nonconstitutional sentencing error has occurred.” United States v. Brown, 417 F.3d 1077, 1080 (9th Cir.2005) (per…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.