Montalvo-Huaracha

Montalvo-Huaracha v. Gonzales

Good Law
176 F. App'x 748
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 2006No. 04-75633California439 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Felix Montalvo-Huaracha, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ *749 (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for cancellation of removal, and denying his motion to remand. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s finding of statutory ineligibility due to lack of continuous physical presence. See Lopez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 847, 851 (9th Cir.2004). We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand. See Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003). We review de novo claims of due process violations in removal proceedings. See Larita-Martinez v. INS, 220 F.3d 1092, 1095 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Montalvo-Huaracha failed to establish ten years continuous physical presence in the United States because Montalvo-Huaracha’s testimony regarding his absences from the United States was vague and inconsistent with the information set forth in his application for cancellation of removal, he had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.