Mendez

Mendez v. Gonzales

Good Law
176 F. App'x 805
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 2006No. 04-76396California254 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Antonio Mendez, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence, Nahrvani v. Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir.2005), we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Mendez does not qualify for withholding of removal because Mendez failed to establish that it is “more likely than not” that he would be persecuted upon return to Peru. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir.2000). Neither Mendez nor his family was ever harmed by the Shining Path guerrillas, and his brother, the primary target of the guerrillas, remained unharmed in Peru for several years after being threatened. See Nahrvani, 399 F.3d at 1153-54 (record did not compel a finding of eligibility for withholding of removal where petitioner was never physically harmed or detained, and suffered only ambiguous threats and de minimis property damage); Lata, 204 F.3d at 1244-45 (9th Cir.2000) (record did not compel a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.