Garcia-Corona

Garcia-Corona v. Gonzales

Good Law
176 F. App'x 817
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 2006No. 04-76377California556 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Raul Garcia-Corona, his wife Ernestina Aniya Medina, and their son Eduardo Garcia-Aniya, all natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ dismissal of their appeals of an immigration judge’s pretermission of their applications for asylum, and denial of their applications for withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture, and cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pur *819 suant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We dismiss in part, deny in part, and grant in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determinations that all three petitioners are statutorily ineligible for asylum based on the one-year bar. See Ramadan v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 1218, 1221-22 (9th Cir.2005). We also lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Ernestina failed to establish the requisite exceptional and extremely unusual hardship for cancellation of removal. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). We therefore dismiss these portions of the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Eduardo is statutorily ineligible…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.