Aguilar-Varillas

Aguilar-Varillas v. Gonzales

Good Law
176 F. App'x 863
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 2006No. 04-74777California275 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ricardo Aguilar-Varillas, his wife, Escolástica Aguilar De Aguilar, and his daughter, Zuleika Aguilar-Aguilar, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence and may reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Rostomian v. INS, 210 F.3d 1088, 1089 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that petitioners failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of an enumerated ground. Because Aguilar-Varillas suffered harassment in his home town in Mexico based on his marriage to his cousin, he fails to establish nexus. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 482-83 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). The mistreatment also never rose to the level of persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016-18 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the asylum claim fails.

Because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.