Passaro

Passaro v. Collins

Good Law
176 F. App'x 893
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 2006No. 04-72244California284 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Anthony Passaro petitions for review of a final order of the National Transportation Safety Board affirming the decision of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) finding that the United States Coast Guard had proved a charge and specification of misconduct against Passaro and properly suspended his Merchant Marine license. We have jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. § 1153 . We review for substantial evidence and will uphold the ALJ’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Borregard v. NTSB, 46 F.3d 944, 945 (9th Cir.1995). We deny the petition for review.

Passaro’s contention that the United States Coast Guard had no authority to bring the instant charges absent a violation of law is without merit because 46 U.S.C. § 7703 (1)(B) specifically grants the Coast Guard the authority to suspend or revoke a merchant marine license due to misconduct. According to 46 C.F.R. § 5.27 , “misconduct” is defined, inter alia, *895 as conduct which violates a ship’s regulation or order.

Substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that Passaro engaged in misconduct by pumping bilge water directly overboard without first passing it through the oily water separator…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.