Torres

United States v. Torres

Good Law
177 F. App'x 557
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 2006No. 04-30528; D.C. No. CR-04-00126-EJLCalifornia288 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Alberto Torres appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction to unlawful re-entry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

As to Torres’ contention that the case be remanded for re-sentencing, because Torres was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the district court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005) (extending Ameline’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional error under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).

As to Torres’ remaining contention that the district court erred in exceeding the statutory maximum two-year sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a), we dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.