Ortega

Ortega v. Gonzales

Good Law
177 F. App'x 591
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 2006No. 04-71887California327 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

*592 Francisco Coronel Ortega and his wife Maria Catalina Coronel, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of their application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We grant the petition and remand for further proceedings.

Petitioners contend that the IJ erred as a matter of law in concluding that they failed to satisfy the continuous physical presence requirement under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A). Petitioners testified that they were apprehended by immigration authorities and returned to Mexico in 1991. The IJ concluded that the apprehension and return constituted a break in petitioners’ continuous physical presence such that they failed to meet the requisite ten-years before issuance of the Notice to Appear.

We recently held that the fact that an alien is turned around at the border, even where the alien is fingerprinted and information about his attempted entry is entered into the government’s computer database, does not in and of itself interrupt the continuity of his physical presence in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.