Bernal

Bernal v. Gonzales

Good Law
177 F. App'x 600
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 2006No. 04-70814California405 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Andres Bernal and Reyna Bernal, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We grant the petition and remand for further proceedings.

Petitioners contend that the IJ erred as a matter of law in concluding that they failed to satisfy the continuous physical presence requirement under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A). Petitioners testified that they were apprehended by immigration authorities and returned to Mexico in 1995 as they attempted to re-enter the United States after a 20 day trip to Mexico. The IJ concluded that the apprehension and return constituted a break in petitioners’ continuous physical presence such that they failed to meet the requisite ten-years before issuance of the Notice to Appear.

We recently held that the fact that an alien is turned around at the border, even where the alien is fingerprinted and information about his attempted entry is entered into the government’s computer database, does not in and of itself interrupt the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.