Force

Force v. Hunter

Good Law
177 F. App'x 641
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 2006No. 05-55917California299 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Civil detainee Steven Daniel Force appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying him leave to file his civil rights complaint in forma pauperis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis, O’Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1990), and we reverse and remand.

Force’s civil rights complaint alleges constitutional violations associated with Atascadero State Hospital’s rules banning visitation with minor family members.

The district court’s order denies Force leave to file in forma pauperis on the basis that official capacity suits for damages are barred under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . While this is correct, Force’s complaint also names the defendants in their individual capacities, see Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 31 , 112 S.Ct. 358 , 116 L.Ed.2d 301 (1991) (state officials named in their individual capacities are persons for purposes of section 1983); Romano v. Bible, 169 F.3d 1182, 1185-86 (9th Cir.1999) (where a plaintiff is seeking damages against a state official, a strong presumption is created in favor of a personal-capacity suit because an official-capacity suit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.