Barrera

United States v. Barrera

Good Law
177 F. App'x 682
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 2006No. 05-50864California131 words

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), remains binding on this court until the Supreme Court overrules it. See United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 414 (9th Cir.2000).

Accordingly, we grant the government’s motion for summary affirmance.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.