Calderon-Estrada

Calderon-Estrada v. Mukasey

Good Law
301 F. App'x 656
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 2008No. 06-74364California903 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Calderón-Estrada (Calderon) appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) affirmation of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order of removal. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here except as necessary to explain our decision. We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal under Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) § 242(a)(2)(D), codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(D), and we review the questions of law raised in this petition de novo. De Martinez v. Ashcroft, 874 F.Sd 759, 761 (9th Cir.2004).

I. Removability on the Basis of Calderon’s Conviction for Attempted Possession of Firearms

Under current law, any alien who is convicted of attempting to possess a firearm in violation of any law is removable. INA § 287(a)(2)(C). In 1994, the INA was amended to include attempted possession as a removable offense. Before the amendment, in 1991, Calderon was convicted for attempted possession of a short-barreled shotgun in violation of Or.Rev. Stat. §§ 161.405 and 166.272.

The language of the 1994 amendment clearly indicates that it is to be applied retroactively. Pub.L. No. 108-416, § 203 (c), 108 Stat. 4305 , 4311 (1994) (“The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.