Yates

United States v. Yates

Good Law
301 F. App'x 679
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 2008No. 07-30410California132 words

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Michael Roger Yates appeals from the 204-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a), (d), and brandishing a firearm in furtherance of a violent offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1)(A). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Yates contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) and by failing to adequately explain the sentence imposed. We conclude that the district court did not procedurally err. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 995-96 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.