Richeson
United States v. Richeson
lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Seth Eagle Richeson appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of *730 child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252 (a)(4)(B), (b)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.
Richeson contends that the district court procedurally erred by: (1) failing to properly consider the nature and circumstances of his offense; (2) failing to give adequate weight to his history and characteristics; and (3) treating the Guidelines range as presumptively reasonable. These contentions are not supported by the record. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-95 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). We further conclude that, in light of the totality of the circumstances, the sentence is substantively reasonable. See id. at 993 .
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid *730 ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.