Gualajara-Ponce

United States v. Gualajara-Ponce

Good Law
178 F. App'x 729
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 5, 2006No. 05-50125California573 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Appellant Gildardo Alberto Gualajara-Ponce appeals his conviction for one count of attempted entry into the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we reverse and remand.

The district court abused its discretion by admitting into evidence over a hearsay objection a referral slip to secondary inspection at a port of entry. The Government proffered the slip to prove the truth of an implicit assertion therein — that Gualajara-Ponce, at primary inspection, had claimed to be an American citizen. See Fed.R.Evid. 801(c).

The Government argues the slip was admissible either as a non-hearsay, prior consistent statement 1 or as a public record excepted from the hearsay rule. 2 We disagree. The referral slip was not admissible as a prior consistent statement because the defense did not express or imply that Officer Pete Florendo had fabricated his testimony; rather, the defense merely contradicted Florendo’s testimony and argued he had incorrectly heard what Gualajara-Ponce had said. See United States v. Bao, 189 F.3d 860, 865 (9th Cir. 1999). In addition, the slip is explicitly excluded from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.