Aragon-Diaz

Aragon-Diaz v. Mukasey

Good Law
301 F. App'x 737
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 2008No. 05-75794California262 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Glenda Yamileth Aragon-Diaz, native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence and will uphold the agency’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Nahrvani v. Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

Aragon-Diaz fails to raise, and therefore waives, any challenge to the IJ’s determination that she does not merit a grant of asylum as a matter of discretion. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Aragon-Diaz failed to establish past persecution or that she has a clear probability of future persecution, because the murder of Aragon-Diaz’s brother was not closely tied to her, see Arriaga-Barrientos v. INS, 937 F.2d 411, 414 (9th Cir.1991), and the subsequent anonymous threatening letters do not establish a likelihood of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.