Alvarado-Martinez

Alvarado-Martinez v. Mukasey

Good Law
301 F. App'x 741
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 2008No. 05-72106California287 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Noemy Alvarado-Martinez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review *742 of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum and withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence and will uphold the agency’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Molina-Morales v. INS, 237 F.3d 1048, 1050 (9th Cir.2001). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Alvarado-Martinez did not qualify for asylum because she failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. See id. at 1051 . Alvarado-Martinez testified that no one harmed or threatened her and she did not demonstrate that the incidents involving her husband and son create a “pattern of persecution closely tied” to her. See Arriagar-Barrientos v. INS, 937 F.2d 411, 414 (9th Cir.1991). Moreover, AIvarado-Martinez’s ability to live safely in El Salvador for the four years following the attack on her son undermines the objective basis of her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.