Ramirez

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated petitions for review, Maria Guadalupe Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders summarily affirming the immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal,, and denying her motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and review de novo due process claims, Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review in No. 06-71378 and deny the petition for review in No. 06-74938.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Ramirez failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. Id.

Ramirez’s contention that the hardship standard set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D) is unconstitutionally vague is unpersuasive. The BIA’s interpretation of the hardship standard in her case falls within the broad range of interpretations authorized by the statutory language. See Ramirez-Perez v.…