Indarto

MEMORANDUM **

Stefanus Kotot Indarto, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review factual findings for substantial evidence, Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d 1425, 1429 (9th Cir.1995), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Indarto’s contentions that changes in country conditions or changes in asylum law, constitute changed or extraordinary circumstances excusing his untimely asylum application because he failed to raise these issues to the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004). In *678 darto has forfeited any challenge to the agency’s determination that his lack of knowledge excused the late filing of his asylum application. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding of no past persecution because Indarto’s experiences do not rise…