Min Chai Lin v. Mukasey
Opinion
lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM ***
Min Chai Lin petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming, without opinion, the decision of an immigration judge ordering Lin excluded and deported from the United States. Lin *383 petitions for asylum and a reversal of the adverse credibility determination that underlay the denial of relief. We deny the petition for review.
We review the IJ’s decision as we would review a decision of the BIA, because the BIA affirmed the IJ’s decision without opinion. See Lanza v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 917, 925 (9th Cir.2004).
Lin contends that the inconsistencies the IJ identified in Lin’s testimony either were immaterial or were satisfactorily explained by Lin, and he argues that the record does not support the IJ’s finding that Lin’s testimony was implausible. We find that at least one of the grounds on which the IJ relied in making the adverse credibility determination is “supported by substantial evidence and goes to the heart of [Lin’s] claim of persecution.” Wang v. INS, 352 F.3d 1250, 1259 (9th Cir.2003). For instance, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Lin testified inconsistently regarding the size of the fine that the Chinese…