Hughes
United States v. Hughes
Opinion
lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Defendant Cynthia Hughes appeals her conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) (Count 1), and aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of the same drug, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) (Count 2).
1. We review de novo a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. United States v. Odom, 329 F.3d 1032, 1034 (9th Cir.2003). We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, considering whether any rational fact-finder could have found all the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. Contrary to Defendant’s argument, sufficient evidence supports the jury’s verdict on Count 1.
Defendant joined the conspiracy before the second trip to Salt Lake City. For example, she allowed the use of her car for Steve Englert’s first drug run to Salt Lake City, loaned her car to other coconspira *390 tors, and was present and using methamphetamine in the house she shared with Englert when he repeatedly sold the drug.