Marks
Marks v. Tower Cleaners
303 F. App'x 391
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 2008No. 08-17167California71 words
lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
A review of the record and appellant’s opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.