Trejo

Trejo v. Mukasey

Good Law
304 F. App'x 533
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 2008Nos. 05-73964, 06-73285California390 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated petitions, Tarsicio Perez Trejo and Maria Luisa Medina, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal (No. 05-73964), and denying their motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel (No. 06-73285). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen and review de novo ineffective assistance of counsel claims. Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review in No. 05-73964, and we'grant the petition for review in No. 06-73285 and remand for further proceedings.

In their opening brief, petitioners fail to discuss, and thereby waive any challenge to, the BIA’s order dismissing their appeal. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

The BIA abused its discretion when it determined that petitioners were not entitled to equitable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.