Akil

Akil v. Mukasey

Good Law
304 F. App'x 631
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 26, 2008No. 05-76982California255 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Muadh Mohamed Akil, a native and citizen of Yemen, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Akil has not established an objective well-founded fear based on his political opinion as being adverse to the views of Islamic fundamentalists in Yemen because his fear is speculative and because the source of the future persecution is unknown. See id. at 1018 ; see also Castro-Perez v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 1069, 1072 (9th Cir.2005). Therefore Akil’s asylum claim fails.

Because Akil failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he failed to show eligibility for withholding of removal. See Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 658 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that Akil failed to establish it is more…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.