Yonemoto

Yonemoto v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Good Law
305 F. App'x 333
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 2008No. 07-16366California303 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Ronald M. Yonemoto appeals the district court’s order granting partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Yonemoto requested certain documents from the VA pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and the Privacy Act. The VA provided the documents, but redacted certain information from them. The VA claimed the redactions were (1) protected under FOIA Exemption 6 and (2) not part of a “system of records,” as defined by the Privacy Act. The VA moved for partial summary judgment with respect to four pages of redacted emails. The district court granted partial summary judgment, and certified it for interlocutory appeal, staying the case pending appeal. We granted the current appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b).

On November 17, 2008, Yonemoto informed the court that the VA produced the redacted materials in the discovery process of his EEOC claim. This production moots Yonemoto’s claims. See Papa v. United States, 281 F.3d 1004, 1013 (9th Cir.2002) (stating production of all nonexempt material, “however belatedly,” moots FOIA claims). Yonemoto argues that the claim is not moot, because the decision would be applicable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.