De Camacho v. Mukasey

Good Law
305 F. App'x 408
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 29, 2008No. 05-73557California478 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*409 MEMORANDUM *

Romualda Aparicio de Camacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence, see Abebe v. Gonzales, 482 F.3d 1037 , 1039-40 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), we deny the petition for review. She has not presented evidence that she has been persecuted or is in danger of being persecuted on account of any of the five statutory grounds justifying relief; nor has she produced evidence qualifying her for relief under CAT.

Petition DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Concurring Opinion

Noonan, J.

concurring:

Immigration law is complex law, as complex to those uninitiated in legal studies as the Internal Revenue Code is to most laymen. Uncounselled aliens venture at their peril into its maze. In the present case the petitioner, without benefit of counsel, sought asylum long after the time for asylum-seeking had past. She did not pursue what might be an available solution to her situation: adoption by her kind benefactor in one of the several states that permit the adoption of adults. Instead, she struggled on, now with a lawyer, in the maze, and she has reached the legal end of the road.

A wise government, however, has realized that enforcement of the technical rules may not always do justice in a particular solution. The executive retains discretion. Aparicio is the mother of two American citizens, her daughter, Brianna Marie, age 13, and her daughter, Ueanna Alicia, age 8. The policies of the United States are designed to strengthen the family not cause its disintegration by deportation of the mother. The two girls returning to Mexico with their mother will face the same conditions that she faced as a poor pei'son of Indian descent vulnerable to abuse and impotent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.