Ochoa De Leon v. Mukasey

Good Law
305 F. App'x 424
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 29, 2008No. 06-71525California234 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Olga Egidia Ochoa De Leon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen and reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings. Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Ochoa De Leon failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).

We also lack jurisdiction to review Ochoa De Leon’s contentions relating to the BIA’s order dismissing her direct appeal because this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).

Ochoa De Leon’s contentions that the BIA failed to consider evidence and did not adequately articulate its reasons for denying relief are not supported by the record.

Ochoa De Leon’s equal protection challenge to the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.