Fuson

Fuson v. Tilton

Good Law
305 F. App'x 425
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 29, 2008No. 07-56631California334 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Robert Fuson appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Fuson is serving a 90-year sentence imposed by a California court after he was convicted of twenty counts of committing a lewd act upon a child. See CaLPenal Code § 288(a). In a certified issue, Fuson contends his conviction was obtained in violation of his Fifth Amendment rights to counsel and against self-incrimination. Raising an uncertified issue, Fuson also contends his conviction was obtained in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation. We affirm.

The admission at trial of Fuson’s incriminating statements to police did not violate Fuson’s Miranda rights. The California courts’ conclusion Fuson was not in custody during his interview was not “contrary to” or an “unreasonable application of’ clearly established federal law. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . Though some facts present here suggest Fuson was in custody, Fuson came to the interview without police compulsion and police repeatedly assured Fuson he was not under arrest and could terminate the interview at any time. See Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492 , 97 S.Ct. 711 , 50 L.Ed.2d 714 (1977) (per…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.