Naiqiang He v. Holder

Good Law
512 F. App'x 710
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 2013No. 11-70365California289 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Naiqiang He, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration *711 judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2010), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination because He claimed that his father’s death in 2005 motivated him to start a family in violation of China’s family planning laws, but He’s testimony and declaration were inconsistent with his household registration and asylum application regarding whether his father had passed away. See id. at 1046-47 (“Although inconsistencies no longer need to go to the heart of the petitioner’s claim, when an inconsistency is at the heart of the claim it doubtless is of great weight.”). Further, the agency was not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.