Gorginyan

Gorginyan v. Mukasey

Good Law
306 F. App'x 355
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 26, 2008No. 05-70278California219 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Lilit Gorginyan and her daughter, natives and citizens of Armenia, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we grant the petition for review and remand the case.

The BIA’s order in this case contains a clear factual error that compromises our review of the decision. In its discussion of petitioner’s past persecution, the decision includes consideration of “the destruction of her store in May 1998 and the other threatening incidents.” These facts are not part of petitioner’s case. Because it is not clear what facts the BIA considered when denying relief, we remand for the BIA to clarify its opinion.

On remand, the government is advised to insure the BIA has a complete copy of the administrative record. The copies received by the court are missing pages AR 255-277.

Based on our conclusion, we decline to reach the remainder of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.