Akcheirlian

Akcheirlian v. Mukasey

Good Law
306 F. App'x 366
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 30, 2008No. 04-71407California247 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ani Varudzanovna Akcheirlian, a native of Russia and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an im *367 migration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence, Pal v. INS, 204 F.3d 935 , 937 n. 2 (9th Cir.2000), we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding that rested on material inconsistencies that went to the heart of Akcheirlian’s asylum claim. See id. at 938 ; see also Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 964 (9th Cir.2004) (upholding adverse credibility finding where at least one of the IJ’s identified grounds was supported by substantial evidence and went to the heart of petitioner’s claim of persecution). Accordingly, Akcheirlian failed to establish eligibility for asylum.

Because Akcheirlian failed to establish eligibility for asylum, she necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.