Halloum

Halloum v. U.S. Department of Labor

Good Law
307 F. App'x 106
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 2009No. 06-71902California307 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ammar Halloum seeks review of a final decision issued by the Department of La *107 bor’s (DOL) Administrative Review Board (ARB), dismissing his “whistle-blowing” complaint under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(SOX), 18 U.S.C. § 1514A. We affirm.

Halloum asserts he was subjected to adverse employment actions by Intel Corporation (Intel) because he notified the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that Intel used fraudulent and inappropriate accounting practices. A subsequent investigation cleared Intel of any wrongdoing. Nonetheless, ARB concluded that Halloum established a prima facie case of retaliation that shifted the burden to Intel to establish, “by clear and convincing evidence, that it would have taken the same unfavorable personnel action against Halloum in the absence of his protected activity.”

We agree with ARB that Intel satisfied that burden and thus did not violate SOX. The administrative record demonstrates that Halloum did not integrate himself into Intel’s workforce or perform up to Intel’s expectations. ARB specifically noted evidence indicating that Halloum missed meetings, was frequently absent from work, failed to perform duties expected…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.