Herrera-Lopez

Herrera-Lopez v. Holder

Good Law
472 F. App'x 730
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 2012No. 10-70201California284 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Anselmo Alonso Herrera-Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision pretermitting his application for cancellation of removal and denying his motion for a continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo claims of constitutional violations, and review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion for a continuance. Cruz Rendon v. Holder, 603 F.3d 1104, 1109 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not violate Herrera-Lopez’s right to due process by pretermitting his cancellation application without first giving him an opportunity to testify. Herrera-Lopez has failed to show that his testimony concerning the outcome of the criminal charges at issue may have affected his eligibility for relief. See id. at 1109 (to prevail on a due process claim, petitioner must show “that the outcome of the proceeding may have been affected by the alleged violation”) (citation omitted).

The IJ did not abuse his discretion by denying Herrera-Lopez’s request for a continuance where the proceedings had already…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.