Gonzalez Garcia v. Mukasey

Good Law
308 F. App'x 95
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 9, 2009No. 05-72154California230 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Carlos Gonzalez Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to his application for Cancellation of Removal. Gonzalez Garcia contended before the Board of Immigration Appeals that his former attorney, Timothy Mason, provided him with ineffective assistance of counsel. Mason was disbarred on July 18, 2004.

Before this court, however, Gonzalez Garcia does not argue that Timothy Mason provided him with ineffective assistance of counsel. Instead, Gonzalez Garcia contends for the first time that his former attorney, Karen Sims, provided ineffective assistance of counsel. Sims worked for Mason. Gonzalez Garcia also proffers new evidence to support this claim.

Gonzalez Garcia presents strong evidence that Sims provided ineffective assistance of counsel before the immigration judge. Indeed, Sims was disbarred on July 19, 2007. This court, however, lacks jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (d)(1). We therefore exercise our authority to stay the mandate for 120 days from the filing of this order to allow time for Gonzalez Garcia’s pro…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.