Olabanji

Olabanji v. Mukasey

Good Law
310 F. App'x 77
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 2009No. 06-75203California531 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Olateju Olabanji, a citizen and native of Nigeria, petitions for relief from the BIA’s affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s denial of his request for a section 212(h) waiver, asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a), and we deny Olabanji’s petition for review.

The BIA held that Olabanji was ineligible for a section 212(h) waiver due to a false claim of U.S. citizenship. This decision was not determinative, however, because even if he were eligible, Olabanji failed to qualify on the merits. His crime was a dangerous one, and he failed to show that a qualifying U.S. relative would suffer *79 exceptional and extremely unusual hardship if he is deported. Furthermore, we lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary decision by the Attorney General that Olabanji was ineligible for a section 212(h) waiver. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir.2003) (“[A]n exceptional and extremely unusual hardship determination is a subjective discretionary judgment that has been carved out of our appellate jurisdiction.”) (internal quotation marks omitted). Therefore, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.