Hernandez

Hernandez v. Indymac Bank

Good Law
532 F. App'x 763
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 2013No. 12-17669California126 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff Jose Hernandez appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources De *764 fense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24 , 129 S.Ct. 365 , 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l., 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.