Geist

Geist v. Capital Group Companies, Inc.

Good Law
479 F. App'x 782
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 2012No. 11-55299California571 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiffs-appellants, investors in the American Funds mutual funds, appeal the dismissal with prejudice of their claims that defendants-appellees Capital Group Companies, Inc., Capital Research and Management Company, and American Funds Distributors, Inc. (together, “defendants”), committed securities fraud in violation of §§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securi *783 ties Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) & 78t(a). The district court held that plaintiffs’ action was untimely because it was filed more than two years after a reasonably diligent plaintiff could have discovered the facts constituting the violation. See Merck & Co. v. Reynolds, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 1784 , 176 L.Ed.2d 582 (2010); 28 U.S.C. § 1658 (b). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we review de novo a district court’s decision to grant a motion to dismiss, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir.2005). We hold that the district court erred in dismissing the action as time-barred; however, because plaintiffs’ complaint fails to allege scienter with the requisite particularity, we affirm the dismissal but vacate the portion of the order dismissing the complaint with prejudice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.