Gray

United States v. Gray

Good Law
311 F. App'x 64
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 29, 2009No. 08-30101California365 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Michael Wayne Gray appeals his sentence of sixteen months following his guilty plea to Providing Ammunition to a Known Convicted Felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (d)(1) (hereinafter Ammunition Charge). We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here except as necessary to explain our decision.

Gray argues that his Ammunition Charge and his earlier charges for both Conspiracy to Possess Marijuana with Intent to Distribute ( 21 U.S.C. § 846 ) and Possession of Marijuana with Intent to Distribute ( 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)) should have been grouped by the District Court pursuant to the Sentencing Guidelines Section 3D1.2. The Sentencing Guidelines Manual provides that “[a]ll counts involving substantially the same harm shall be grouped together into a single Group.” U.S. Sen-tenoing Guidelines Manual § 3D1.2 (2007); see also United States v. Smith, 424 F.3d 992, 1015 (9th Cir.2005). The Commentary to the Guidelines Grouping Chapter notes that counts can be grouped when they are contained in the same indictment or when sentences are to be imposed at the same time or in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.