Campos

MEMORANDUM *

Daniel Campos appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. Because we find sufficient evidence of both possession and intent to distribute, we affirm.

“We review de novo the district court’s denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal based on insufficient evidence. Our review of the underlying jury verdict, however, is highly deferential.” United States v. Bearing, 504 F.3d 897, 900 (9th Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The evidence is sufficient to support a conviction if any rational jury could have found Campos guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Id.

The evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. When the police went to Campos’ home to arrest him for failure to report to his parole officer, they found Campos hiding in a closet with $760 dollars in cash in his pocket. While searching the bedroom which Campos had previously told his supervising officer was his, police found drugs, plastic baggies, a digital scale, and a video surveillance system in plain view. They also found more drugs inside the…