Reese

United States v. Reese

Good Law
539 F. App'x 752
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 2013No. 11-30100California71 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Reese admits he didn’t see the allegedly defective notice before trial, and doesn’t allege he would have accepted a plea agreement but for the erroneous sentencing information. He therefore hasn’t demonstrated that the alleged error “affected substantial rights.” United States v. Gonzalez-Aparicio, 66 3 F.3d 419, 428 (9th Cir.2011).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.