Longia

Longia v. Mukasey

Good Law
312 F. App'x 2
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 2008No. 05-75874California303 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gurmeet Singh Longia, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming without opinion the decision of an immigration judge denying his motion to reopen proceedings in which he was ordered excluded in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Lo v. Ashcroft, 341 F.3d 934, 937 (9th Cir.2003), we grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

The agency abused its discretion in denying Longia’s motion to reopen where the evidence of record shows reasonable cause for Longia’s failure to appear. See Urbina-Osejo v. INS, 124 F.3d 1314, 1316 (9th Cir.1997) (observing that “reasonable cause” under former 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b) can exist if petitioner does not receive adequate notice of hearing). The agency failed to mail the notice of hearing to the exact name and address provided by Lon-gia. See Busquets-Ivars v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 1008, 1010 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that the invocation of a presumption of notice requires the agency to prove that the notice was properly addressed). Additionally, the record copy of the mailing envelope, upon which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.