Corber
Corber v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
540 F. App'x 650
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 2013No. 13-56306California89 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
We conclude that Plaintiffs petition for coordination was not a proposal to try the cases jointly. See Judith Romo, et al. v. Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc., No. 13-80036 (9th Cir. Sept. 24, 2013). We AFFIRM the district court’s order granting Plaintiffs’ motion to remand.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Dissenting Opinion
Gould, J.
dissenting:
I respectfully dissent for the same reasons expressed in the dissent to the majority opinion in Romo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, No. 13-56310.