Williams-Windom

Williams-Windom v. Potter

Good Law
312 F. App'x 64
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 2009No. 07-55772California401 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Fannie Williams-Windom appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Postmaster General of the United States Postal Office (“USPS”). Williams-Windom filed an action against her employer, the USPS, for discrimination on the basis of race, gender, age, and disability, and unlawful retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a)(1) and 2000e-3(a); the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623 ; and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehabilitation Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 794 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we recite them only as necessary.

The district court did not err by granting the USPS’s summary judgment motion on Williams-Windom’s claims of discrimination based on race, gender, and age in violation of Title VII and the ADEA, and her retaliation claim. Williams-Windom *66 failed to show that the USPS’s articulated reasons were pretextual. See Villiarimo v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., 281 F.3d 1054, 1062-68 (9th Cir.2002).

Further, the district court did not err by granting the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.