Martinez-Leppe

Martinez-Leppe v. Mukasey

Good Law
313 F. App'x 20
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 2008No. 06-73122California221 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Geoffry Romy Martinez-Leppe, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 , 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992), we deny the petition for review.

*21 Even assuming that Martinez-Leppe was targeted on account of a protected ground and that his experiences rise to the level of persecution, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of asylum because he did not show the gang members who targeted him were forces the government was either unable or unwilling to control. See Castro-Perez v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 1069, 1071-72 (9th Cir.2005).

Because Martinez-Leppe failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See id. at 1072 .

Because Martinez-Leppe has not “specifically and distinctly argued and raised” the issue of CAT relief,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.