Gonzalez-Cevala

Gonzalez-Cevala v. Holder

Good Law
313 F. App'x 982
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 2009No. 04-72807California204 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Humberto GonzalezCevala, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s continuous physical presence determination. Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 614, 618 (9th Cir.2006). We grant the petition for review and remand.

An intervening change in the law requires us to remand on the issue of continuous physical presence. In Ibarra-Flores , we held that administrative voluntary departure under threat of deportation breaks the accrual of continuous physical presence only where the alien is informed of the departure’s terms and knowingly and voluntarily accepts them. See id. at 619-20 ; see also Tapia v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 997, 1002-04 (9th Cir.2005).

The agency “should be given the first opportunity to assess the consequences of [Gonzalez-Cevala’s] departures[s] under the ‘knowing and voluntary’ standard.” Ibarra-Flores, 439 F.3d at 620 . We therefore grant the petition for review and remand for further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.